14
2025.8
author
132
Reading volume






|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||








No one tool holder system is one-size-fits-all. Tool holders built for high-speed finishing processes often lack the rigidity and strength required for efficient machining, such as rough blank castings. In contrast, tool holders used for roughing often lack dynamic balance, which allows the tool holder to operate smoothly at high speeds during the finishing process.
Additionally, the thick design and large volume of roughing tool holders can limit their reach for finer or deeper part features. whereasDifficult-to-machine materialsA tool holder with enhanced strength and rigidity is required. In addition, the vibration damping capacity of the tool holder and the ability to deliver coolant are also important selection criteria. Using an unsuitable tool holder can lead to dimensional errors and part scrap, as well as excessive wear on the machine spindle, reduced tool life, and increased risk of tool breakage.
In non-critical operations, an inexpensive tool holder may yield satisfactory results. However, in processes where repeatable accuracy must be achieved, especially when expensive workpiece scrap reduces part margins, investing in application-focused, high-quality tool holders can protect against such unexpected losses at a lower cost.